Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Another Book on Collapse, Another Set of Markers to Mark Our Extinction?

Cormac McCarthy's "The Road" might be a portending story of coming times:


Her interview was a bit contentious. On 94.3 FM, Seattle -- http://www.kuow.org/program.php?id=23970

Complexity, the human brain not wired through several million years of evolution to understand long-term risk, socio-biology of Stephen Gould and E.O. Wilson, the problematic issue of most humans not able to think abstractly or holistically, the driving force of constant upgrades on technology, the continued boulder avalanche of yet more social media networks -- Facebook 3.0? -- and humanity. Costa draws these challenges into her book that is now getting a lot of air play and promoting.

Read the preface and the book review Costa's book. Here are her supermemes that hobble humanity.
Is this what keeps us inactive understanding how to work as a global society, supposedly networked by technology, communication, with all these super transnational organizations like the United Nations, all the NGOs, and the corporate state? Are we not wired to understand and plan for climate change? Do we have a brain wired to only go so far? Are we just apes with nuclear weapons? Read on, and consider these five human collective thinking patterns to conjure up how we can deal with a planet without ice.  

1) Irrational opposition  2) The personalization of blame 3) Counterfeit correlation
4) Silo thinking  5) Extreme economics


"The Watchman's Rattle," Rebecca Costa

What fascinating and enigmatic creatures we are. A short history of our rocketing ascent into dominance over the fragile patina of life enveloping this planet might extend as far back as 50 thousand years but its most telling and suspenseful chapter is surely the latest one, the one witnessed by most of the readers of this book. At its core, The Watchman’s Rattle is one person’s panoramic step backward from the breathtaking hubbub of daily news—its wars, failing economies, and biological calamities-- to calmly ask: Who’s piloting this ship and where is it going?” Our author for this journey is Rebecca D. Costa, an unabashed optimist herself but hardly one to suffer a polyannish makeover of the social problems that beset us. This is a serious and thoughtful work, as admirable for its cut-to-the-chase analysis of how we become captive to our social complexity, as for its insightful and practical suggestions for finding a way out of it. This is a book worthy of study.

Serious as the subject matter is (subtitled ‘Thinking our way out of extinction’), The Watchman’s Rattle reads like an engaging story, in this case a crime novel. The opening chapters set the stage for us—evolution of the human species and its cognitive abilities for reasoning and the use of powerful tools. The plot thickens as the author samples the history of human social development from its biological underpinnings, exponential ascension to untenable complexity and ultimate demise. The causes of death are the usual suspects for these anthropological intrigues – famine, disease, drought, loss of biodiversity-- but the actual murder weapon, Ms. Costa argues, is always the same: the incapacity of humans to deal with the exponentially expanding complexity of their social systems. How can we escape Hobson’s Choice, the certain catastrophic failure of a society too big to manage its unsustainable growth?

Insight usually begins with a sudden penetrating vision of the problem at hand. In this regard, the middle of this book shows the author at her best, in a clear and systematic application of biological principles to explain the origins and persistence of human social behaviors both good and bad. By her own characterization Ms. Costa is profoundly influenced by the principles of Darwinian evolution and the elegantly simple power of natural selection to shape both the biological and sociological characteristics of animals for the environments they live in. The transmittable units of social behavior, so-called ‘memes’, propagate through cultures much as genes do, increasing or decreasing reproductive success in accordance with their fitness for a particular time and place within our culture. Ms. Costa expands this treatment to identify five powerful and self-perpetuating “supermemes”, essentially cultural beliefs or habits so powerfully ingrained in our day-to-day lives that expression of even the most reasonable and adaptive alternative actions is suppressed. Our uniquely human powers of imagination, exploration and experimentation are thus effectively imprisoned by these supermemes, ultimately quenching even the most rational applications of knowledge so painstakingly accumulated by science. Beliefs and knowledge, Ms Costa warns us, are dangerously out of balance.


Review of the book:

New Hope for Those Searching for Signs of Intelligent Life On Earth

Reviewed By David M. Kinchen

I'd just about given up hope in my search for signs of intelligent life on Earth -- let alone the Universe -- when two events gave me hope: The successful extraction of 33 miners from almost half a mile under the surface of the desert of northern Chile. and finishing reading Rebecca D. Costa's "The Watchman's Rattle: Thinking Our Way Out of Extinction" (Vanguard Press, 384 pages, notes, bibliography, index, $26.95).

Actually, I should clarify the latter statement: I read "The Watchman's Rattle" for the first time. It's the kind of book you'll want to keep and read over and over. You'll end up, as I did, underlining and annotating your copy as you discover "aha!" moments. In fact, this is one of the most important books I've read all year and I recommend it for anyone who wants to get an introductory course in the discipline of sociobiology that was pioneered by Edward O. Wilson, who contributed the foreward to "The Watchman's Rattle."



One of the essential messages of Costas' book is to look beyond "memes" -- widely held beliefs, conventional wisdom or behaviors -- and to challenge the five "supermemes" that defeat humans even before they engage the problem. Costas says supermemes encompass "any belief, thought, or behavior that becomes so pervasive, so stubbornly embedded, that it contaminates or suppresses all other beliefs and behaviors in a society."

What are the five supermemes?

1) Irrational opposition (pages 67-86)

2) The personalization of blame (pages 87-109)

3) Counterfeit correlation (pages 111- 128)

4) Silo thinking (pages 129-145)

5) Extreme economics (pages 147-178)

I'm listing the page numbers because it's important -- vital, even -- that these five supermemes be understood and absorbed. It's a case of knowing your enemy. Read those five chapters over and over again, and read the chapters preceeding and following the five, too. Material contained in the seven chapters may be in the next pop quiz! (Before ending up in journalism, I considered a career in academe).

Irrational opposition occurs "when the act of rejecting, criticizing, suppressing, ignoring, misrepresenting, marginalizing and resisting rational solutions becomes the accepted norm," Costa says. She cites the case of Wag Dodge, a firefighter who discovered a major lifesaving concept while he was fighting a major wildfire: "Imagine for a moment if Dodge has dismissed his revelation that lighting a smaller fire around him would save him from a more dangerous one. Imagine if Darwin had abandoned the notion of evolution simply because he could not prove the existence of genes. Imagine if Einstein's theory of relativity had been cast aside because it wasn't consistent with accepted Newtonian physics."

One example Costa uses for personalization of blame, the second supermeme, is the demonization of the Big Three auto executives who flew in their private planes to Washington, DC in 2008, to ask Congress for billions of dollars of federal funds to restructure their businesses --- a move that has turned out to be a success, the author notes (as did Pulitzer Prize-winning auto writer Dan Neil on Bill Maher's Friday night, Oct. 15 HBO show "Real Time"). "With news that they had flown in private planes...every politician, political commentator, talk show host, reporter, and citizen suddenly objected to helping rich CEOs who don't fly commercial like the rest of us." Costa adds that the subsequent firing of General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner confirms the truth of the saying of American business icon Robert Half: "The search for someone to blame is always successful."

The third supermeme, counterfeit correlation, is called, in the author's shorthand, "Clavinism" after the know-it-all postman Cliff Clavin on the popular TV show "Cheers." Cliff Clavin always prefaced the trivia that he mistook for reliable research with the statement: "It's a little known fact that...." Costa says that in the 21st century "we have not only perfected counterfeit correlation, but we have fallen under its spell."

The fourth supermeme is silo thinking, "compartmentalizing thinking and behaviors that prohibit the collaboration needed to address highly complex problems." Silos exist everywhere, Costa says: the CIA doesn't talk to the FBI; physics professors don't set foot in the economics departments of universities; Republicans don't talk to Democrats; defendants don't talk to prosecutors, etc., etc. "And we wonder," Costa states, "why society is gridlocked and broad, complex, systemic problems continue to worsen."

The fifth and final supermeme, extreme economics, "occurs when simple principles in business, such as risk/reward and profit/loss, become the litmus test for determining the value of people and priorities, initiatives and institutions," says Costa. Dean Kamen, the inventor of the Segway scooter, is one of the visionaries Costa cites in her chapter on extreme economics. In 2008 Kamen's company announced a small water purifying system, called the Slingshot, that produces "10 gallons of clean water an hour on 500 watts of electricity" -- about the amount of electricity needed to power one string of Christmas tree lights for an hour. Kamen says the system can be fueled by methane gas produced by cow manure, a readily available commodity in the developing world, where potable water is a critical need.

Another example Costa cites -- in the chapter after the one on extreme economics -- is the concept of microloans, developed by Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus, who won the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize for perfecting and popularizing microfinance.

Yunus began his experiment in microfinance in 1974, when he loaned to a group of 47 impoverished people the equivalent of $27, out of his personal savings, to buy materials for their baskets. The women basketmakers established self-sustaining businesses and repaid Yunus in full, with interest. The success of his Grameen ("Village") Bank, established in 1983, led to the creation of thousand of microlending organizations around the world. To date, more than 97 percent of Grameen Bank's loans to the poor have been repaid on time and with interest, demolishing the commonly held belief that poor people are bad credit risks.

Costa believes that the mounting complexity of a problem can outpace the brain's ability to absorb and address it. With compelling evidence, she shows how we tend to quick-fix our problems by addressing the symptoms, instead of finding permanent solutions, leading to dangerous long-term consequences.

Costa presents -- in clear, easy-to-grasp prose -- ideas that can show us how to reverse our own downward spiral. Citing cutting-edge research, she reveals how the human brain can spontaneously call upon a powerful cognitive tool -- insight -- to overcome the negative stereotypes inherent in five supermemes. If we don't, we may suffer the fate of early advanced civilizations, like the Maya of Central America, and become extinct.


The final chapters of The Watchman’s Rattle turn our attention to a possible off-ramp from paralytic indecision and fractious failure to act: the cultivation and application of Insightful Thinking. There is much to be learned from modern neurosciences about the human potential for imaginative thought and adaptive behavior. Though not a neuroscientist herself, Ms Costa has no reticence to suggest ways to accelerate our performance in this area. Where she lacks firsthand authority she finds it in the professional expertise of others and translates their thoughts into layman’s language for the rest of us. Frequent references to personal experiences with her family and friends give a biographical air to this reading; there are even some recommendations for a better diet (thankfully no recipes) and physical exercise to improve mental functions. Maternal as these admonitions may come across to the reader, they remind each of us that a mind prepared for insightful thinking probably needs better feeding and regular mental exercise to sustain good function throughout life. Each of us has a role to play here -- call it Costa’s Parallel Incrementalism -- where the seemingly insignificant force of one person’s unconstrained revaluation of habit becomes the ‘Aha’ experience that seeds explosive change in others. Evolution of new structure and function is glacially slow for most of our organ systems, but the capacity for enhanced performance of the human brain through synaptic rewiring of neural networks will have immediate affect.

It’s a good place to begin looking for a solution.
 
The Watchman’s Rattle will eventually take its place on the bookshelf amid many other laudable works that move human society one step closer to a stable and graceful cohabitation of this planet. Let us hope that the courage, determination and compassion expressed in these few pages will draw out new appreciation for both the difficulty and attainability of this quintessentially important objective.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Can Green festivals teach us to end ‘corporatocracy’?



Gatherings blend commercial with social justice, spiritual healing

Paul K. Haeder


Note -- This is the conclusion of a look at the 10th annual Green Festival in Seattle. Read part 1 here
http://www.downtoearthnw.com/stories/2011/jun/19/seattle-green-festival-crossroads-crosshairs-green/


It was “the economic hit man” telling the greenies about “a new way” to a peaceful world that is another chink in the armor of capitalism’s loosening grip on the rest of the world.

“It’s the first time in human history we are all being impacted by the same problems,” John Perkins told 150 or so in the grandstand at the 2011 Seattle Green Festival. “We are all in this together,” Perkins continued. “It’s all our space station, except this one doesn’t have shuttles to resupply.”

Perkins once was a gung ho soldier of empire as a National Security Agency thug, and a higher-up in an international consulting firm where he ended up in Indonesia, Panama, Ecuador, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and other strategically important countries.

He was working deeply for the U.S. ‘corporatocracy’ – banks, corporations and Uncle Sam – to wedge into those areas by promulgating despotic regimes, resource plunder and gross social injustice.

Earlier this year, Perkins was also the headliner at the Green Festival, an event full of pseudo pop change of consciousness razzmatazz. He now lives in the Pacific Northwest, and his new moniker – anti-predatory capitalist – lets him look toward melting glaciers of the Himalayas and Amazonian shamans to guide the world into one of self-actualization.

Perkins professes he helped put into place the mechanisms of “shock capitalism” worldwide, and those policies led to the elements leading to Sept. 11, 2001.

Here’s what the Boston Herald says about his book, “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man:” “(His) story is so astonishing it defies belief…. imagine the conceptual love child of James Bond and Milton Friedman.”

So what could top his personal confession and 180-degree green/social justice turnaround, away from the purveyors of the industrial military, prison, oil and mining complexes he once helped prop up?

Sneakers by Ethletic? Sweatshop free, Fair Trade certified, eco-friendly, and vegan. These tennies are something else, from the www.autonomieproject.com – fighting global poverty and global warming one shoe step at a time.

This festival rah-rah is brought to us by Global Exchange and Co-op America – all with the triple bottom line in mind: sustainable economy, ecological balance, social justice.

Kevin Danaher is called the Paul Revere of globalization’s woes, and he’s co-founder of Global Exchange and the brain behind “green festivals.” I’ve interviewed him on my radio show, “Tipping Points: Voices from the Edge,” have been on a panel with him at the Community Building via teleconferencing, broke bread with him in Spokane, and listened to him at last year’s Sustainable September where he was the keynote speaker.

Danaher has written about the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and World Trade Organization.

“The Green Festival was kind of a secondary institution in that about seven or eight years ago Global Exchange was having one of those strategic direction discussions, this one around growth. How do we grow the organization?” he said.

He and others identified two growth models: one is to expand your membership, revenues, staff, programs, etc. The other is create a larger institution of real estate, a commercial real estate property, where your organization is a tenant, and bring in allied organizations to fill the building, and become the revolution center, “the green-global-economy-people’s-bottom-up-development center, or whatever you call it.”

“So we came up with the idea of Global Citizen Center, but I wanted the ground floor retail portion to be Green-Mart, the opposite of Wal-Mart, the entire green economy eco-mall, which nobody’s done yet, surprisingly enough, and I realized that I didn’t know the green economy movement because my 10 books were all about the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization, all this big, global economy kind of stuff,” Danaher said. “So we figured that if we did a weekend event, The Green Festival, that would get us to know this green economy movement, build some credibility.”

What the Green Festival can do is bring the minds of people like those from Co-op America, a non-profit that works on responsible shopping by breaking the spin of sweatshop purveyors. For instance, the CEO of Kohl’s makes $5.4 million a year, yet sweatshop abuses tied to 12-hour work days, denial of medical care after on-the-job injuries, contaminated water and impossible production goals have been prevalent in Kohl’s Guatemalan, Salvadoran, Nicaraguan and Bangladesh source clothing factories.

Exchange Kohl’s with The Gap (CEO salary — $8.89 million) or J.C. Penney (CEO salary — $10.3 million), and you get the idea. While Edward Humes was hawking his pro-Wal-Mart book and blathering on about how Wal-Mart was the next best green thing since Al Gore, think of Wal-Mart’s CEO making $29.6 million annually, plus another $4.5 million in stock options, as abuses overseas and domestically persist.

The Green Festival, as is reflective of many contemporary green events, was full of contradictions, hope, and the reality that we have all been colonized by monopolists like Bill Gates and frauds like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg (as of 2011, his personal wealth was estimated to be $13.5 billion).

Danaher has been citing Jed Emerson’s philosophical vision of this “movement” – “He uses the term, ‘blended value,’ and he talks about how do you get those three sets of values to blend, so that you are healing society, healing nature, and making a profit—but you’re not making a profit so you can be Donald Trump and be a billionaire and waste money on a coke habit, but you can plow that money back into the project, which is to save humanity from itself,” he said. “That’s the challenge that’s in front of us now, not ‘save the planet.’ The planet will save itself by exterminating us. It will shuck us off like any other bad bug.”

The ideas of a global brain and paradigm shifts to the 5th power swirl around Green Festivals like granola sticks to a vegetarian’s ribs.

The future is in the hands of children, and Zoe Weil of Human Education inspired the festival audience with hope and belief that teaching kids critical thinking skills is one thing, but helping them become choice makers and change makers for the ”movement” is a whole other kettle of fish.

She talked about teaching compassion and engaging students to learn what it means to respect the work of animal welfare, environmental preservation , and social justice. She’s looking for curricula that not only motivates educators to mentor youth to acquire relevant knowledge, skills, and a commitment to live ethically, sustainably, and peaceably, but cuts to the very fabric of education – all levels should be about meaningful information that is inspiration and provides tools for creating a safe and humane world.

“Solutionaires” is what Zoe calls graduates of the new educational model, armed with vision and solutions.

That’s what we hoped would emanate from the early Green Festivals. Maybe this global brain Danaher talks about is full of the pulsating bio-polar ADD, co-dependent traits of our individual brains. Maybe we all are suffering the fatigue of economic meltdown, technological dependence and community destruction?

Maybe we need to honor both the profound and profane that comes with these Green Festivals. Maybe we need to stop perpetuating the problems and redefine how we live with each other, with our soul and heart – nature.

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Potpouri of Things going on in the NEWS -- Can We Connect the Dots?

We are finding it more difficult for people -- stressed by job failure, economic failure, media failure, family failure, community failure, political  failure, and a failure of their own confidence to be the Demand in D-EMOCRACY -- to make connections. There are so many ways the American society dumbs us down. Man in Canada, I was just there for a week with movers and shakers in planing, development, ecological footprinting, architecture, green technology, sustainability. There are many things about Canadians that strike me -- my mother was born in Powell River, BC, about 70 miles north of Vancouver, where I was at the UBC institute on sustainability leadership -- that came back at me again July 4-9. They have a sense of optimism, a sense of a strong education system, a sense that Canada, with all that land and all those resources and that paltry population total -- 28 million population. They are wondering what the hell is going on in the lower 48 -- tea bagging hell. Huge cuts to our nation's one strength -- education, leadership in innovation and creativity and work. Education is the key, and the corporations have done the great theft -- taken away the will of our forefathers' goals to shape this country into a more democratic and open society, one that would take education and a tough Fourth Estate to the hilt in order to help shape the world. Weird that those guys like Jefferson were diversity's progenitors in odd ways -- not perfect, for sure, but compared  to this corporate, political, financial class of people at the top, almost a dream.

I'll connect these stories in a future blog, but for now -- it's clear how interrelated these stories are:


Congress is threatening to roll back a key energy efficiency victory our movement won in 2007. The "BULB Act" (H.R. 2417) attacks standards that would require new light bulbs to achieve higher efficiency levels - and it may reach a VOTE as early as Monday.

The BULB Act will COST American households $100 to $200 every year in missed energy savings. The bill's sponsors claim that the lighting efficiency standard is an outright ban on incandescent bulbs. On the contrary, advanced incandescents meet efficiency standards and they have created 2,000 new American jobs.

H.R. 2417 is simply a lose-lose-lose proposition for America. It will COST us money, kill green jobs, and pollute our air. Please, use your influence to stop the attacks on this fundamental energy efficiency mandate. Write your Senators and Representative, speak out against the BULB Act.

Tell Congress to Protect the Cost Saving Light Bulb Efficiency Standard - Strike Down the BULB Act

Passage of the BULB Act will result in 100 million tons of unnecessary global warming pollution per year - the equivalent of putting 17 million additional cars on the road. The missed energy savings will cost Americans $12 billion every single year.

In 2007, light bulb efficiency standards passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, and with backing from the lighting industry. Even George W. Bush supported these energy saving measures.

If Congress pulls away from this fundamental efficiency mandate, WE will foot the bill and our planet will suffer the consequences. Please send a letter Congress today, advocating a NO vote on the BULB Act.

Send a Message to Congress Opposing the Threat to Light Bulb Efficiency Standards

We expect a vote on Monday, please send your letter today. Let's make some noise and protect our planet!

Kathleen Rogers/
President, Earth Day Network


Illustration by Mr. Fish


Published on Monday, July 4, 2011 by TruthDig.com

Ralph Nader Is Tired of Running for President

by Chris Hedges
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/04-4

The most important moral and intellectual voices within a disintegrating society are slowly discredited when their nonviolent protests and calls for justice cannot alter intransigent and corrupt systems of power. The repeated acts of peaceful civil disobedience, efforts at electoral and political reform and the fight to protect the rule of law are dismissed as useless by an embittered, dispossessed and betrayed public. The demagogues and hatemongers, the purveyors of violence, easily seduce enraged and bewildered masses in the final stages of collapse with false promises of vengeance, new glory and moral renewal. And in the spiral downward the good among us are reviled as naive and ineffectual fools.

There is no shortage of courageous dissidents in America. They seek to thwart the imperial disasters, looming financial insolvency and suicidal addiction to fossil fuel. They have stood in small knots on street corners week after week, month after month, year after year, to denounce the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have occupied banks, shut down coal-fired power plants, attempted to halt mountaintop removal, interfered with whaling ships and walked in blustery weather to the White House, where they were arrested. They are struggling to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza on a ship called the Audacity of Hope. But because the corporate state and the two major political parties are indifferent to principled calls for reform, and because the mass of the public still buys into the myths of globalization and the American dream, the plundering and destruction continue unimpeded.

*************
 
 
 
Leaving Trader Joe's in Las Vegas!


Plus... Fair Food allies in California prepare for week-long Trader Joe's Tour, with meetings and actions from LA to San Francisco!

"Why I'm saying goodbye to Trader Joe's," is the title of an article published in the July 6th edition of the Las Vegas Weekly that reflects the sentiments of Trader Joe's customers everywhere, including more and more longtime customers who are growing increasingly disenchanted with the "progressive" grocer's indefensible decision to give farm labor justice the run-around in its tomato supply chain. Here's an excerpt:

"... Of course, Immokalee’s struggling farmworkers don’t have much to do with Las Vegas—except that they do, every time we go to Trader Joe’s. The friendly, yuppie grocery store that boasts bargain-basement prices on everything from produce to butternut squash bisque to frozen biryani, has refused to sign the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ Campaign for Fair Food. Among the campaign’s demands: not to employ growers that tolerate worker abuses (which have gone as far as slavery) and a penny-per-pound price increase to be passed along to the people who do the picking.

TJ’s isn’t the only company ducking the CIW’s demands. Taco Bell, McDonald’s, Burger King, Subway and Whole Foods have all inked agreements, but to date, no other grocery chain has joined the campaign. Still, it’s Trader Joe’s that has me the most rankled, what with its organic and gluten-free options, ethical ambiance and smiley, Hawaiian-shirted staff. But mostly I’m upset, because TJ’s is my favorite. They even say they don’t have a problem paying the extra penny, they just object to some of the language and terms in the agreement. But until they sign, I won’t be going back. So please, Joe, get your act together. I miss that damn bisque."
 
 
read more --- http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2011/jul/06/so-long-trader-joes/
 
*************
 
Why Eating Meat Could Give You Diabetes



Research is showing that exposure to certain pesticides and other toxic chemicals could cause diabetes.

July 6, 2011

The following article first appeared in Mother Jones.
The United States has one of the highest diabetes rates in the developed world—and the malady is spreading faster here than it is in most other rich nations, a recent Lancet study (registration required) found.

I've always associated our diabetes problem with the steady rise in sweetener consumption since the early '80s, triggered by the gusher of cheap high-fructose corn syrup that opened up at that time. But another culprit may be contributing, too: exposure to certain pesticides and other toxic chemicals. A new peer-reviewed study published in the journal Diabetes Care found a strong link between diabetes onset and blood levels of a group of harsh industrial chemicals charmingly known as "persistent organic pollutants" (POPs), most of which have been banned in the United States for years but still end up in our food (hence the "persistent" bit—they degrade very slowly).

The ones with the largest effect were PCBs, a class of highly toxic chemicals widely used as industrial coolants before being banished in 1979. Interestingly, the main US maker of PCBs, Monsanto, apparently knew about and tried to cover up their health-ruining effects long before the ban went into place. Organochlorine pesticides, another once-ubiquitous, now largely banned chemical group, also showed a significant influence on diabetes rates.

***************
The Invisible Food Crisis


Food prices are going up everywhere. Will they start rising in America, too?

By Annie Lowrey

The next time you are in your local grocery store, look for signs of dramatic inflation. You won't find any. In all likelihood, your bananas and breakfast cereal and milk are about the same price as they were a year ago. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the price of a basket of common foods increased only about 1.5 percent in 2010, after declining 0.5 percent in 2009.


Perform the same exercise in an Egyptian or Bangladeshi market, and you would get a different picture. In the past few months, skyrocketing food prices have raised concern among economists and anti-hunger advocates—and rising food costs have even helped foment revolutions. This week, the World Bank reported that food prices increased 15 percent from October to January and have climbed 30 percent in the past year. Currently, the bank's price index sits just 3 percent below its 2008 record. The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization keeps a separate index of food costs—and it blew past the all-time record last month. Wheat prices have doubled since last summer. The price of corn has risen about 75 percent since June. Prices for sugar and cooking oils have also jumped. The consequences are potentially devastating. The World Bank says that spiraling food costs have driven 44 million people into extreme poverty since June 2010.


What is causing such a drastic spike? And will it ever reach America?

The price spike is explained through a number of dynamics. First, farmers have diverted more resources to growing crops for biofuels, such as ethanol made from corn and biodiesel made from palm oil. Currently, the United States diverts millions of bushels of corn to fuel-production—whereas it diverted virtually no corn to the process 10 years ago. Writing in the Washington Post, Princeton scholar Tim Searchinger says that biofuels now eat up 6.5 percent of the world's grain supply and 8 percent of its vegetable oil. Such competition for crops pushes prices up.

Second, the simple laws of supply and demand are in play as well. In developing nations, more people are buying more food. Moreover, they are purchasing more meat, which requires not just the cow or pig, but the grain to feed it. And as demand for food has increased, there have been supply shocks. A few key producers of food, such as Russia and Australia, have suffered brutal droughts or floods. And because nations now tend to hold smaller stockpiles of grains and other staples—partially due to changing World Trade Organization rules—the food supply chain is now more sensitive to such supply shocks.

Finally, there are less direct market forces. Commodity speculation—traders making bets on the direction of commodity prices—can drive up the price of crops and fuel, a major component of food costs. The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, has printed trillions of new dollars in the last two years—lowering interest rates in the United States and increasing the amount of money available for investment. Those dollars might be seeking returns in emerging markets, driving up inflation there. (Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said earlier this month that the price spike could be better explained by the faster pace of economic growth in emerging economies—the so-called "two-speed recovery.")

Red more -- http://www.slate.com/id/2285530/

************************

Headlines -- DEMOCRACY NOW

As Debt Talks Threaten Medicare, Social Security, Study Finds U.S. Spending $4 Trillion on War


As part of ongoing debt negotiations, the White House has proposed slashing more than $4 trillion from annual budget deficits over the next decade — twice what Obama had proposed earlier. While much of the talk in Washington centers on taxes, Social Security and Medicare, far less attention is being paid to the growing cost of the U.S. wars overseas. A new report from Brown University has estimated the true cost of the U.S. wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan will end up costing approximately $4 trillion — far more than the Bush or Obama administrations have acknowledged. The authors of the study reveal that because the war has been financed almost entirely by borrowing, $185 billion in interest has already been paid on war spending, and another $1 trillion could accrue in interest alone through 2020. We speak with Neta Crawford, co-director of the Costs of War Project, and a Professor of Political Science at Boston University.


UN: Drought, Violence Causing "Unimaginable Human Tragedy" in Somalia
 
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is warning violence and severe drought in Somalia is leading to a “human tragedy of unimaginable proportions." Some 54,000 people fled Somalia into the neighboring nations of Kenya and Ethipoia in June alone, three times the number of Somalis who sought refuge in May. Over 50 percent of the children arriving in Ethiopia, and up to 40 percent of those arriving in Kenya, are reportedly malnourished. The UN is receiving increasing reports of children under five dying en route to their destination. UNICEF spokesperson Michael Klaus said the crisis is amplified by rising food prices.


Michael Klaus: "The drought situation in the Horn of Africa I definitely one of the worst we have seen in the past decade, it is worsened by the sky rocketing food prices which we have seen, in Somalia we have seen increases of more than 200% parts of northern Kenya more than 80% increase compared to last year which is really very severe. We now see more or less 10 million people in urgent need of humanitarian assistance; some 2.8 million of those are in Somalia so that is 1 in every 3 Somalis actually in need of assistance. Malnutrition rates particularly in the south are really high — we see now that 1 in 3 children in the south are severely.

Vermont Won’t Charge Nuclear Plant Owner Over Radioactive Leak
 
Vermont prosecutors have decided not to file charges against the owners the state’s lone nuclear plant, the Vermont Yankee. Entergy Corporation had been under investigation for misleading officials during a probe into a radioactive tritium leak at the plant in 2010. Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell said he believes Entergy held back information but said the case lacks sufficient evidence to ensure a conviction.


William Sorrell: "As of now, no criminal charges will be filed against the corporation or any employee. Entergy and certain of its personnel have acted in — at best — an untrustworthy manner. However, we lack the smoking gun evidence to prove to our satisfaction, let alone that of 12 Vermont jurors, this untrustworthy behavior was criminal."

Exxon Mobil: No Repair Plans in Place for Ruptured Montana Pipeline
 
The oil giant Exxon Mobil has acknowledged it is yet to develop a repair plan for a ruptured oil pipeline beneath Montana’s Yellowstone River. The Exxon Mobil Pipeline Company says as much as 42,000-gallons of crude oil has leaked into the water and onto surrounding lands. On Tuesday, “Democracy Now! spoke to area resident and farmer Alexis Bonogofsky about the spill.


Alexis Bonogofsky: “The place where there’s oil on our property is a really diverse area with lots of diverse plant species and wildlife. Usually when you go down there in the evening, that’s all you can hear — frogs, toads, a lot of insects, crickets, and birds. And right now you walk there at dusk and don’t hear anything.”

In Reversal, Admin to Send Condolence Letters to Families of Vets Who Committed Suicide
 
The Obama administration has reversed a longstanding U.S. policy to deny presidential condolence letters to families of soldiers who have committed suicide. Democracy Now! broke this story in 2009 when we interviewed the parents of Chancellor Keesling, a U.S. soldier who took his own life during his second tour of duty in Iraq. During his first deployment, Chancellor suffered mental health issues so severe he was placed on suicide watch. After getting back to the United States, Chancellor turned down a bonus offer to return to Iraq in the hopes that he would not be redeployed and could get his life together. He committed suicide one month after the military forced him to return.
 
*****************
 
E-D-U-C-A-T-I-O-N --
I-N-F-O-R-M-E-D Populace
P-A-T-I-C-I-P-A-T-O-R-Y democracy
F-R-E-E- S-P-E-E-C-H
 
So what does a sustainability blog have to do with all of this politicized and holistic stuff? As I saw at the University of British Columbia's leadership institute, of which I am a graduate, the easy stuff is Net Zero or Net Positive building construction, or measuring carbon emissions, or fancy computer dash boarding of all sorts of things to measure a company's green policies and actions. It's the social sustainability stuff that is the heavy lift, the messy stuff, the real substantive material to work on. Social justice, social responsibility, ecological justice.
 
Without free speech, education, participation from the bottom up, and free speech, we have an uninformed society. The corporate state is NOT where we want to go. Yet, in Canada, all these greenies worry about the third world Wild West nature of America's fall from grace -- our violence-ridden society and the backward nature of things scares the crap out of them -- they still have no idea of the great push in the country, decaying and crumbling as it is, of a movement to stop the corporate state.

The greenies in Canada still do not get the rush of activity in this decaying and defunct culture of a huge movement to call a spade a spade, and more and more over-educated out of work folk will be call out the corporate wrongdoing abetted by the political class. Canadians in the traditional sustainability arena think that two rights and ten wrongs equal right, or the right direction. So, GE and other corporations are bagging way more than their legal limit in Canada because Canadians have a belief that any amount of new black the green economy generates is better than nothing at all, even if it comes in the form of bad companies doing bad business but offering green measures. Oh well, read on and make the connections from the above to this great piece.

Sorry about the long blog, but that's that.
******************

GE: "Imagination at Work" in Building the Corporate State

By Miles Mogulescu

I was watching Meet the Press on Sunday as a panel of Washington insiders offered a variety of views from across the political spectrum ranging from A to B. Halfway through the program an authoritative-sounding voice interjected itself into the proceedings to announce, "Meet the Press is Sponsored by GE: Imagination at Work" while a GE "Imagination at Work" logo filled the screen.

And I thought, there you have it: The perfect embodiment of the emerging corporate state in which discussion of our economics and politics is dominated by a handful of multinational conglomerates; the middle class is hollowed out; wealth is concentrated in the top 1% who pay a lower and lower percentage of their personal and corporate income in taxes as the government is increasingly unable to afford basic services like public schools; political leaders blame teachers and unions for our financial plight and undermine collective bargaining; corporate functionaries rotate between business and government; corporations can make unlimited donations to political candidates who advance their interests; and the Washington pundit class calls on politicians to have the "courage" to cut Social Security and Medicare because "America is broke and we can no longer afford it".

GE: You may think they're the guys who "bring good things to life" by manufacturing refrigerators and washing machines in American factories, paying living union wages and benefits, and selling affordable appliances to American consumers. But that was yesterday; this is today. Today, less than 6% of GE's revenues come from its consumer appliance division. GE's main businesses are global finance, media, energy, defense contracting, and lobbying the government for tax breaks and subsidies.

GE is incorporated in New York and its worldwide headquarters are at 30 Rockefeller Plaza ("30 Rock") where every Christmas they're kind enough to display quite a lovely tree for the public to enjoy. But its wealthy top executives, like those of many American-based global corporations, are increasingly untethered from any interest in the economic and social well being of America as a whole. Here's a snapshot of some of GE's global businesses:

• GE Media: Not only does GE sponsor Meet the Press, which is highly influential in setting the policy agenda in Washington. It owns 49% of NBC Universal whose media assets include not only the NBC TV network (including NBC News) and local stations in America's largest cities, but Universal Studios (one of the 5 major US film studios), Telemundo, which is the second largest Spanish language TV network in the US, and such cable networks as Bravo, CNBC, MSNBC, SyFy, USA Network, the Weather Channel, and (in partnership with Hearst and Disney/ABC) A&E, the Biography Channel, the History Channel, and Lifetime, along with television networks in other countries around the world. There's hardly an area of the motion picture, television, and TV news business where GE doesn't own a substantial stake.

• GE Financial Services: GE's financial arm, GE Capital, is responsible for 30% of GE's revenues and more than half its profits. If it were classified as a bank, GE would be the 7th largest bank in America. As the New York Times put it, "many Wall Street analysts view G.E. not as a manufacturer but as an unregulated lender that also makes dishwashers and M.R. I. machines."

Since GE is not classified as a bank, it manages to avoid most of the regulation that applies to banks. Nevertheless, during the 2008 financial crisis, GE deployed a team of top lobbyists (GE spent nearly $40 million in lobbying last year) to convince the federal government to allow it to exploit a loophole (it owns two small Utah savings and loans) to become one of the largest recipients of Federal bank bailout funds. Unlike other banks like Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, and Citigroup, it didn't take the bailout funds through TARP and thus wasn't subject to TARP restrictions, such as limits on executive compensation -- in 2010, GE CEO and Obama economic advisor Jeffrey Immelt made $15.2 million.

Rather it took the bailout funds in the form of $139 billion in Federal guarantees of GE Capital debt under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), nearly 25% of the total federal funds provided under the program. The Federal guarantees expires in 2012, a date known in banking circles as "the cliff", since at that time the Federal government will have to make good on the debt if GE and other borrowers don't honor their obligations. But despite the fact that a large part of GE's profits are due to financial support from the Federal government, and the Feds are liable for a big part of GE's debts, GE pays not a single dollar in Federal taxes.

• GE Energy: The GE Energy Infrastructure unit of GE is made up of 3 GE companies, GE Energy, GE Oil & Gas and GE Water Process Technologies. While GE is developing a large solar energy business in the hopes of taking advantage of government-subsidized financing, and has launched its "Ecomagination" ad campaign in the hope of marketing itself as a green company, it has a record as one of the largest corporate polluters. Using EPA data, the Political Economy Research Institute found that GE is the 4th biggest producer of air pollution in the US. According to the EPA, only the US government, Honeywell and Chevron produce more Superfund toxic waste sites.

But most striking, GE designed and built one of the six nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan that is now spewing radiaton, and built two of the others in partnership with Toshiba. These Japanese nuclear plants are based on GE's Mark 1 boiling-water reactor designs that were marketed by GE as cheaper and easier to build than other designs. But according to the New York Times, "it has long been thought to be more susceptible to failure in an emergency than competing designs." GE, it brings good things to life.

• GE Defense Contracting: GE is a key member of the military/industrial complex which, according to its own reports, in 2009 sold over $5 billion in military products both to the United States and foreign governments, including engines for naval vessels and military aircraft such as fighters, tankers, helicopters, surveillance aircraft and bombers. Among other things, GE provides alternative engines for the F-15 Fighter jets, one of which, costing $30 million, was shot down over Libya last week. Naturally, the nearly $40 million dollars a year GE spends on lobbying seeks to protect Federal spending on GE-manufactured armaments and doesn't suggest lowering the deficit by cutting America's defense spending which nearly equals the aggregate total defense spending of every other country in the world combined.

• GE Lobbying and Tax Avoidance Divisions: While not officially operating divisions, GE's tax avoidance, lobbying, and political contribution operations may effectively be among the most profitable areas of the GE empire.

According to an investigative report in last week's New York Times, in 2010 GE reported $14.2 billion in worldwide profits, including $5.1 billion from US operations, but GE owed exactly $0 dollars in Federal taxes. In fact it claimed a tax benefit from Uncle Sam of $3.2 billion. Over the past 5 years, GE has accumulated $26 billion in American profits, yet received $4.1 billion in net Federal tax benefits. Yet contradicting Republican political claims that cutting tax on corporations and the wealthy creates American jobs, since 2002, GE has eliminated 20% of its US work force while expanding job creation overseas.

According to the Times:

It's extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore. G.E.'s giant tax department, led by a bow-tied former Treasury official named John Samuels, is often referred to as the world's best tax laws firm. Indeed, the company's slogan 'Imagination at Work' fits this department well. The team includes officials not just from the Treasury, but also from the I.R.S. and virtually all the tax-writing committees in Congress...Over the last decade, G.E. has spent tens of millions of dollars to push for changes in tax law.

It's a classic example of how the modern corporate state operates. Moderately paid employees at government regulatory agencies and key congressional committees aspire to lucrative jobs at GE and other major corporations when they retire from government if they write regulations and laws which enhance corporate profits. Corporations then rotate some of their employees back for new stints in government service where they insure rules and laws favorable to the corporations.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, GE spent nearly $40 million in lobbying in 2010 (over $200 million in the past decade) and contributed $2,230,270 to Republican and Democratic House and Senate candidates in 2010. This doesn't count things like an $11 million donation from GE's foundation to schools in the district of Democratic Congressman Charles Rangel, then Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which "coincidentally" came a month after Rangel reversed his position to support continuation of a tax break which, according to a regulatory filing, had saved GE more than $1 billion on US taxes in the 3 years after it was enacted.

And it doesn't include perhaps GE's biggest political coup of all, President Obama appointing GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt -- the man who presided over GE's success in avoiding taxes and eliminating American jobs -- to replace Paul Volcker as head of Obama's panel of economic advisers, the newly renamed President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. It's the ultimate case of regulatory capture in which the industries being regulated by the government come to dominate the agencies charged with regulating them. This time it's the White House itself. The man who presided over GE's success in avoiding American taxes on its $14.2 billion in profits and in eliminating 20% of its American workforce gets to advise the president on how to rebuild the economy and create American jobs. (Hint: I don't think it will include raising taxes on the rich, reducing military spending, strengthening regulation of business, or increasing worker rights.)

So there you have GE's "imagination at work". A bank that's not a bank but gets over $100 billion in Federal bank bailout loan guarantees. An energy company that builds the nuclear reactors that are radiating people in Japan. A major defense contractor that profits from America's wars. A media company that owns TV networks, movie studios and major news operations. A political lobbyist and campaign donor whose executives rotate between business and government and back again and create loopholes that allows the largest corporation in the world to pay no taxes. A corporation whose $15 million a year CEO is appointed by President Obama to be his chief advisor on creating jobs. It's the very definition of the corporate state at work.

Fighting back to protect democratic rights and the income and economic security of the middle class is in some ways a more complicated in an ostensibly democratic, but increasingly corporate-run, country like the United States than it is more directly authoritarian societies like those in the Middle East. But we have no choice but to fight back if America is to continue as a broadly middle class nation where most people can realistically hope that their children will live a better life than they do. The protests sparked by Republican overreaching on behalf of corporations in states like Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan may be the beginning of a movement to reclaim America's middle class dream.

This past weekend, 250,000-400,000 people marched in London to protest the conservative government's draconian cuts in social services and the failure of some of Britain's largest corporation to pay a fair share of taxes. It's vital that the movement they began cross the Atlantic Perhaps a good next step in America would be a well-organized boycott of GE, accompanied by mass demonstrations at GE headquarters and sales outlets, to make GE the poster child for corporate greed in response to its failure to pay US taxes on its billions in profits while exporting jobs overseas. It wouldn't, by itself, stop GE. But it might focus the country on the manifest injustices wrought by companies like GE and encourage the emergence of a progressive Tea Party-type movement against the power of the growing corporate state.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/ge-imagination-at-work-in_b_842111.html?view=print

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Back to Food and Big Ag Writing the Wrong Rules

Back into the BC-Vancouver Summer Sustainability Week. It's a bit grueling today, with more of the wonky stuff -- energy tracking, global greenhouse gasses, climate action plans, sustainability accounting and measuring. One great aspect of a week-long event is the interaction with the 30 students-participants. Food, and the huge global picture, those were discussed. It's admirable that BC is doing things for greening their province, but the bottom line is there are no community stakeholders here that count -- people of color, people of poverty, people of the more deep ecology kind.

So, this is a short blog, introducing something I harp on -- how the USA's food is being ripped out of the small farmers' hands.

Here's Food and Water Watch's newest campaign to stop the machinations of big ag:
*********************

While we want to ensure that our lettuce and spinach are always safe to eat, it doesn't make sense to create food safety rules that only the biggest farms can follow. Unfortunately, that's just what USDA is suggesting with its proposal to establish a national Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. If we're not careful, this strategy will hurt small farms and allow Big Ag to write its own rules for food safety.

Can you tell USDA not to let the biggest players in the produce industry write their own food safety rules?

Shortly after the E. coli outbreak in 2006, the leafy greens industry in California got together to try to fix its image, creating something called a marketing agreement for lettuce, spinach, and other leafy greens grown in the state. Problem is, the standards developed by the California agreement required drastic measures that were most suited to large-scale producers, including trying to keep all wildlife off of farms. Small farms and those that tried to incorporate water quality protection, wildlife habitat preservation, or organic methods found it hard to comply. Even though the marketing agreement is voluntary, it sure doesn't seem that way to farmers if all of their buyers require participation.

The biggest players in the produce industry want to take this flawed model nationwide and the USDA has proposed a way to do just that. Right now, USDA is taking public comments on its proposal for a national version of the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. Tell USDA you don't want the biggest players in the produce industry to write their own food safety rules that hurt small, sustainable producers.


Submit your comment here:http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7250


Thanks for taking action,

Katy Kiefer
Education & Outreach Organizer
Food & Water Watch
goodfood(at)fwwatch(dot)org

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Here We Go Again with the Great American Traitor Corporations Using Spineless lawmakers and judges to Kill Free Ideas


So, in sunny Vancouver, I am on day-three of this five-day leadership course, at this really progressive University of British Columbia campus, learning about sustainability, how BC and Vancouver want to be the greenest places on earth. No matter how much spin or technology and energy and resource metering gets into these discussions, luckily, this weeklong institute has the wherewithal to get people in who know what greenwashing is and know that there are larger issues to sustainability that see to get the short shrift all the time.

Even with that frame -- depending on planners and energy and resource gurus --  they have the gumption to give us those planners and development experts who fail the sustainability test by really not taking on several of the FIVE e's in sustainability, yet, we get to go to the farm and see true ecological, economic, educational, energy, and equity sustainability in action. It's an interesting way to see a movement's deficits -- really lacking the guts to tackle community development, wages, and livability, and happiness and health, in most camps, to promote this or that cool gizmo or solar sucking thing.



Students in 2000 drove the board and community and powerbrokers to "save" the land they had been working on teaching people and bringing in community (communities of every shape and kind) to understand the interconnectedness of farming-food-ecology-community.


Students. Fighting for 24 hectares of land, with a community plan behnd them, looking at green academics, multidisciplinary work, across ages, economics, cultures. Andrew Rushmore, UBC Farm/Center for Sustainable Food Systems, spoke of one leading edge fighter for this parcel of complex land to stave off the developers and housing proponents. That would be Moura Quayle, UBC Saunder School of Business who chaired Vancouver's Urban Landscape Task Force, which resulted in the birth of the city's Greenways program.




Thirty conference participants, five staff, and, well, unfortunately, not the more than a dozen speakers and facilitators, were on the farm. But while I am in sunny BC, the news down under -- in the lower 48 -- is daunting. That's a whole other blog series -- how Canadians see us, as impediments, to solving global problems. They know they have their problems, but the attack on social services, teachers, unions, and smart thinking and action, well, Canadians are looking like we all are characters in Deliverance Three -- The Next Chapter in the Tea Party. So, via Alternet, here's the ugly news:

Mark Bittman on Proposed Big-Farm Film Ban: "The System is Already Gagged"

Bittman has a great column this week about the ridiculous proposed laws to ban filming and photography at farms. Animal rights and sustainable food activists have embarrassed corporate farms by publishing footage of how corporate farms actually treat animals, and the disgusting and cruel conditions that they maintain (the footage is often shot by brave employees of the farm who are offended by what they see at work every day). In response, the food industry pushed legislators to just make it illegal to record what goes on in their facilities. The laws haven’t passed, but it’s still nearly impossible for journalists (or anyone else) to get into factory farms to see how things are run. Bittman tried, and was repeatedly refused.
When a journalist can’t see how the food we eat is produced, you don’t need ag-gag laws. The system’s already gagged.
The videographers that have made it into closed barns have revealed that eggs are laid and chickens are born and raised in closed barns containing (literally) hundreds of thousands of birds; an outsider wouldn’t even know what those barns were. Pigs are housed cheek-to-jowl, by the many thousands, in what are called concentrated animal feeding operations, where feeding, watering and monitoring are largely mechanized. Pregnant sows are confined in small concrete cells. Iowa is industrial agriculture’s ground zero. But when it comes to producing animals, zero is pretty much what you’re going to see.

Which would bring us a step closer to China, whose Health Ministry is trying to clamp down on news media outlets that “mislead” the public about food safety issues. (It’s worth noting, on the other hand, that the Chinese Supreme Court has called for the death penalty in cases of fatal food poisoning.) “Mislead” apparently means reporting about pork tainted with the banned drug clenbuterol, which sent a couple hundred wedding guests to the hospital; watermelons exploding from the overuse of chemicals; pork disguised as beef, or glowing blue; and — my favorite — cooking oil dredged from sewers. (Check my blog for the details.)
Our watermelons don’t explode and, for now, I can write about it. Yet when a heroic videographer breaks a horror story about animal cruelty, as happens every month or so, the industry writes off the offense as an isolated incident, and the perpetrators — usually the workers, who are “just following orders” — are fired or given wrist slaps. Business continues as usual, and it will until the public better understands industrial animal-rearing techniques.
And until the food industry stops intimidating journalists, suing anyone who speaks ill of them, and using their economic and political might to obliterate small ethical farmers.

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/630562/mark_bittman_on_proposed_big-farm_film_ban%3A_%22the_system_is_already_gagged%22/#paragraph2

Monday, July 4, 2011

Oh Canada, the Petro State -- Global Warming Hippies?


Canada Day, then the Fourth of July. I am attending a world class sustainability leadership class, July 4-8, at UBC-Vancouver. But not much else is well in the Maple Leaf state, where my mom hailed from -- Powell River, BC.

Here's a little on the leadership course --

Summer Institute in Sustainability Leadership
JULY 4-8, 2011 VANCOUVER, CANADA


ABOUT THE INSTITUTE


The Summer Institute in Sustainability Leadership is an intensive one-week professional development program designed for those taking a leadership role in developing policy, creating plans and implementing sustainability projects in businesses, colleges, universities, and across all levels of government.

This award-winning program provides you the opportunity to engage in creative thinking about your role as a sustainability leader and the actions your organization can take to move the sustainability agenda forward.

The Summer Institute in Sustainability Leadership offers a wide variety of perspectives and practical tools needed to integrate sustainability as a core value in your organization.

Participants learn to develop strategies, plans and procedures that are mindful of public policy, stakeholder interest, and the triple-bottom-line.


2011 Institute Highlights


The 2011 Summer Institute in Sustainability Leadership will feature:

Keynote talks by innovative leaders in the sustainability field, including Dr. Brian Nattrass, author and sustainability advisor to major corporations and government, and Dr. Bill Rees, creator of the 'ecological footprint' framework

Inspiring session speakers from industry, academia, government, and non-profit sectors

Interactive format providing opportunities for networking and knowledge sharing

Applied case studies and guided field excursions showcasing real-life examples of Sustainability initiatives

Reviews --

"This institute exceeded expectations on every level. The program offers integrated, interdisciplinary strategies and understandings that provide a baseline for the individual and organizational journeys toward a sustainable vision and experience.”

* * *

"I’ve been involved in sustainability education and environmental citizenship for 6 years and this week has been amazingly valuable! If I could summarize the week, it’s been all about connecting the dots.”

* * *

"The Institute has re-confirmed my commitment to sustainability. I gained some very practical ideas for advancing sustainability in my organization.”

* * *

"I came hoping for some ideas on writing an energy policy and achieving organizational efficiency. I am leaving with a comprehensive arsenal of frameworks, strategies, principles and vision.”

* * *

"An engaging, educational, inspiring course with excellent content and second to none speakers. A must for all involved in the sustainability field – and for those who are not!”

* * *


Published on Saturday, July 2, 2011 by CommonDreams.org

Canada Day In The Petro-Stateby Chris Genovali



Just in time for Canada Day, Alberta Finance and Enterprise Minister Lloyd Snelgrove chose to exhibit why Canadian democracy is devolving into something akin to corporate rule ("Ottawa urged to get behind Enbridge pipeline," Edmonton Journal, June 23). This particularly appears to be the case in the province of Alberta where, more often than not, it is government of the oil industry, by the oil industry, for the oil industry.

Despite vast opposition, Enbridge continues its relentless campaign to convince the leaders of BC communities that the proposed Northern Gateway Pipelines, which would carry oil from the Alberta tar sands to the Great Bear Rainforest in northern British Columbia, are in the best interests of the people of BC.In an interview with Postmedia News, Snelgrove called on the federal government to essentially undermine the National Energy Board's assessment process and endorse the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline post-haste before the NEB's Joint Review Panel hearings on the highly controversial project have even commenced. Enbridge is proposing to build a twinned pipeline from Alberta's tar sands to British Columbia and then transport what many have called the world's dirtiest oil by supertanker from BC's north coast to offshore markets.

Snelgrove's childish temper tantrum directed at federal and provincial governments, which to his dismay are not out cheerleading for Northern Gateway at the same volume as the budding petro-state of Alberta, contained several ironic elements. A few of them are explored here:

Snelgrove contends that Northern Gateway is "of national economic significance." Like Enbridge CEO Patrick Daniel before him, Snelgrove reflexively conflates the interests of Enbridge's shareholders and unnamed $100 million investors with the interests of the Canadian people, but the incongruence of his assertion goes far beyond that.

In contradiction to Snelgrove, Enbridge has actually indicated in its own Environmental Assessment that Northern Gateway is not of national or provincial economic significance: "Despite the magnitude and duration of project effects on GDP and employment, the effects on the provincial and national economies are considered not significant relative to the overall size of these economies."

More:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/02-4

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Rio Tinto, Wal-Mart, Mining, Salmon, Sanity - Stop Killing Bristol Bay's Salmon's Future


http://www.redgoldfilm.com/

http://www.feltsoulmedia.com/redgold_studyguide.pdf


Good news that the Pebble Mine lie is still able to be broadcast in national media outlets, most recently by National Resources Defense Council through Robert Redford in the NYT.

We've had the film, Red Gold, shown in Spokane, and the filmmakers have been on my radio show, Tipping Points: Voices from the Edge. This is a compelling film, deep and creative on many levels, looking at mining versus cultural and ecological rights.

Check out the Robert Redford Op-ed, and the film:

Colorado Filmmakers Travis Rummel and Ben Knight of Felt Soul Media
teamed up with Trout Unlimited Alaska’s Lauren Oakes to produce Red Gold. With the support of many locals in Bristol Bay, the crew of three spent 10 weeks in the field during the summer of 2007, gathering footage for film and interviewing people for and against the mine. Trout Unlimited is North America’s largest coldwater fisheries conservation organization with programs based around the nation. The Alaska program is deeply engaged in the campaign to protect the world-renowned fisheries in this watershed.

From NRDC --

In a full-page New York Times ad paid for by our Members, NRDC Trustee Robert Redford called national attention to the Pebble Mine as "an environmental tragedy waiting to happen" and urged Americans to express their opposition to the Rio Tinto and Anglo American corporations. Meanwhile, in London, a full-page ad placed in the Financial Times by NRDC and our Alaskan coalition partners challenged Rio Tinto, which has a well-documented record of pollution disasters, to deliver on its new green rhetoric by abandoning its stake in the Pebble Mine.

The mine, two miles wide and 2,000 feet deep, would be gouged out of wilderness above Bristol Bay, at the headwaters of the greatest sockeye salmon runs in the world. Millions of salmon are the linchpin of an ecosystem -- filled with bears, moose, caribou, wolves and whales -- that has sustained Native communities for thousands of years. The gargantuan gold and copper operation would produce an estimated ten billion tons of contaminated mining waste that would have to be held back forever by massive earthen dams, some taller than China's Three Gorges Dam, in an active earthquake zone. The mine is opposed by 80 percent of Bristol Bay residents, including a broad-based coalition of Native villages, fishermen, sportsmen and businesses.

At the shareholder meeting in London, Rio Tinto's board heard testimony against the mine from NRDC Senior Attorney Joel Reynolds and from Kimberly Williams, executive director of Nunumta Aulukestai, an association of nine Native village corporations. "There was speaker after speaker on behalf of communities around the globe, calling on Rio Tinto to remedy a long list of mining ventures gone bad," says Reynolds. "We're determined to spare Bristol Bay that kind of devastation by making sure this mine never gets built."

There was good news for the campaign in February, when Mitsubishi, one of the major backers of the Pebble Mine, withdrew from the project. Less than one year ago, NRDC met with Mitsubishi executives in Tokyo and delivered to them 100,000 Petitions of Protest from our Members and activists. Now we're calling on Anglo American and Rio Tinto to follow suit by abandoning this misguided venture.


Check out an action letter here:

Your message will be sent to:

Cynthia Carroll, Chief Executive, Anglo American Corporation

Subject line:

Leave Bristol Bay and its belugas alone

Dear Chief Executive Carroll,

As you know, the United States government recently designated more than 3,000 square miles of Alaska's Cook Inlet as critical habitat for a genetically unique and geographically isolated population of endangered beluga whales. The last thing these whales need is more industrialization of their favorite waters.

Therefore, I am adamantly opposed to your plans for the Pebble Mine, which call for the construction of a marine terminal, slurry pipelines and roads in or around Cook Inlet. We will not tolerate the potential destruction of an endangered species' critical habitat for the sake of corporate profits.

Furthermore, your mine would also threaten the beluga population of Bristol Bay, which depends heavily on the area's abundant salmon runs. It would be unconscionable to build a mega-mine -- with colossal dams that must hold back an estimated 10 billion tons of mining waste forever -- at the headwaters of our planet's greatest wild salmon river systems.

Some risks are simply too big to take -- especially in an active earthquake zone like Bristol Bay. I am familiar with your company's long and dismal record of polluting the environment. I don't want you gambling with one of our last and greatest wild places -- an ecosystem that supports Native communities, thriving fisheries, and a vast array of spectacular wildlife, including important populations of beluga whales.


https://secure.nrdconline.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2319&JServSessionIdr004=xtlockzjz2.app341a

This blog is brought to you by

This blog is brought to you by
Paul Haeder

Fuse Washington

Fuse Washington